<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When RAID arrays go bang</title>
	<atom:link href="http://harrymetcalfe.com/2009/02/when-raid-arrays-go-bang/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://harrymetcalfe.com/2009/02/when-raid-arrays-go-bang/</link>
	<description>Harry&#039;s Home on the Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 02:32:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry</title>
		<link>http://harrymetcalfe.com/2009/02/when-raid-arrays-go-bang/comment-page-1/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 21:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harrymetcalfe.com/?p=29#comment-173</guid>
		<description>For the mirroring? I did.

When I went with RAID 5 I did it because of the cost implications -- you get a bit more bang for your buck than with RAID1.

Unfortunately the server is back to being a heap in the corner because I chose reiserfs for the system drive and then had a power cut. Argh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the mirroring? I did.</p>
<p>When I went with RAID 5 I did it because of the cost implications &#8212; you get a bit more bang for your buck than with RAID1.</p>
<p>Unfortunately the server is back to being a heap in the corner because I chose reiserfs for the system drive and then had a power cut. Argh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://harrymetcalfe.com/2009/02/when-raid-arrays-go-bang/comment-page-1/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 10:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harrymetcalfe.com/?p=29#comment-161</guid>
		<description>Why not simply use raid 1?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not simply use raid 1?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

